National Workshop on Building Synergies: Matching Business Reforms to Improved “Ease of Doing Business”

This workshop held in New Delhi is part of NCAER Study on Matching Business Reforms in India’s States to the ‘Ease of Doing Business’, funded by prosperity fund, British High Commission, BHC.

The opening address welcoming delegates and providing an overview of the project was delivered by Dr Shekhar Shah, Director General NCAER. An introduction to the BHC perspective on EoDB was delivered by Mr Aurodeep Nandi, Deputy Head of Economics, Ease of Doing Business Lead. An introduction to the study was presented by Dr Anushree Sinha, Senior Fellow at NCAER.

The first session in this National Workshop was a Country Expert Panel, chaired by Mr Suman Berry and speakers included Dr Sher Verick, Deputy Director, ILO and Professor Shreekant Gupta, Delhi School of Economics. The third session was on Industry perspective and was chaired by Professor Santosh Mehrotra, JNU and was moderated by Aurodeep Nandi. Dr Sanjeevan Bajaj, Adviser, FICCI Quality Fourm, Ms Vanitha Datla, Deputy Chairwoman, Indian Women Network & Vice-Chairperson, Elico Ltd, Hyderabad, Mr Richard McCallum, Managing Director, UK India Business Council, Mr Amol Kulkarni, Sr. Policy Analyst, CUTS International, Jaipur and Mr Manish Mishra, Chief Regulatory Affairs, Tata Steel were the speakers for this session.

The aim of NCAER’s ‘Building Synergies’ initiative is to evaluate business regulations in India, matching DIPP’s business reform plan with actual conditions on the ground. The special focus of the study is on reforms in tax policy and administration, construction permits, and regulatory and inspection reforms. For this, NCAER conducted an extensive survey of 600 firms and state government officials across 12 selected states to gauge the effectiveness of business reforms. The findings are expected to provide policy makers and investors real time feedback on the implementation of business reforms across the focused states.

The last session in this workshop was chaired by Prof Shreekant Gupta in which NCAER presented its findings from the survey of all the 12 states. The study methodology was presented by Dr A C Kulshreshtha and Dr Rajesh Jaiswal. Dr Anushree Sinha presented the state level findings and Dr Pallavi Choudhuri presented the industry level findings. In his talk, Professor Shreekant Gupta lauded the rigour and depth of the NCAER study. He also suggested that such a study should to be repeated every year to understand the evolving situation on ground on EoDB. Dr Rajesh Chadha’s concluding remarks included a mention of the proactive engagement of India and UK in the field of research.

This workshop was the last in the series of three workshops aimed at building engagement with the government, industrialists, industry experts, UK business experts, academia, multilaterals and other stakeholders. The first regional workshop held on 14 December, 2016 at the NCAER focused on the states of Haryana, Punjab, Delhi, Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Tripura. The second regional workshop held on January 17, 2017 at Institute of Public Enterprise (IPE), Hyderabad focused on Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Kerala, and Karnataka. The last and National Workshop provided results from all the 12 states and included participants from all the focused states.

State of the Economy Seminar February 2017

NCAER’s latest forecasts show a GDP growth rate of 6.9 per cent for 2016–17 and 7.3 per cent for 2017–18. These forecasts are based on NCAER’s annual GDP model on annual model for GDP market prices at constant (2011–12) prices forecasts.

The Gross Value Added (GVA) at Basic Prices at constant (2011–12) prices is predicted to grow at 6.3 per cent in 2016–17 and 7.0 per cent in 2017–18. Real Agriculture GVA is forecasted to grow at 3.7 per cent, real Industry GVA at 5.5 per cent and real Services GVA at 7.3 per cent in 2016–17.  Wholesale Price Index (WPI) inflation is projected at 3.6 per cent for 2016–17. Inflation is projected to accelerate in 2017–18 due to rising crude oil inflation.

The removal of the legal tender status of high value currency notes (Rs 500 and Rs 1,000) with effect from the midnight of November 8, 2016 took the domestic economy by surprise, raising fresh anxieties about economic recovery, leading to a downward forecast. Global economic uncertainty has added to these concerns.

Notwithstanding the fact that the monsoon arrived about nine days later than its normal date of arrival, the year 2016–17 has been a good one for the agricultural sector. NCAER estimates suggest that the total foodgrain production is going to touch a record of 272 million tonnes, 8 per cent higher than the corresponding figure of 251.6 million tonnes harvested last year. The production for crops like rice (108.8 million tonnes, about 4.2 per cent above last year’s output), wheat (96.6 million tonnes, about 4.7 per cent more than last year’s output) and pulses (22.1 million tonnes, 35 per cent higher than last year’s output of 16.4 million tonnes) is expected to reach record levels in 2016–17.  This increase in harvest is expected to help in keeping food inflation low.

The growth of the industrial sector remained lackluster. The overall Index of Industrial Production (IIP), a measure of industrial performance in the country, shows a growth of 0.3 per cent during April–December 2016–17, when compared to the 3.2 per cent growth recorded during the same period of 2015–16. The Index of Industrial Production (IIP) contracted by 0.4 per cent in December 2016, as compared to the growth of 5.7 per cent it recorded in November 2016. Seventeen out of 22 groups experienced negative growth with a decline of –0.5 per cent in manufacturing in April–December as compared with the 3.2 per cent growth rate achieved during the same period of the previous fiscal, reflecting a massive downward swing in production.

The year-on-year (y-o-y) growth of Gross Value Added for the services sector (excluding construction) showed stagnant growth between 2015–16 (8.9 per cent) and 2016–17 (8.8 per cent). Tourist arrivals registered higher growth (55.2 per cent) during the third quarter, as compared to the rise of 14.6 per cent witnessed in the second quarter of the current fiscal. Aviation passenger traffic growth continues to exhibit double digit growth.  Both port and aviation cargo traffic picked up speed in the third quarter.

The performance of the external sector in the third quarter of 2016–17 has shown signs of improvement. Merchandise exports grew for the fifth consecutive month in January 2017, up by 4.3 per cent. This improvement can be attributed to economic normalisation of the world economy, led by revival of growth in the US, UK, Germany and Japan. On the other hand, merchandise imports grew significantly at 10.7 per cent, as compared to the growth of 0.5 per cent registered in the previous month. Nonetheless, the merchandise trade deficit narrowed to $9.8 billion from $10.4 billion recorded the previous month.

On the inflation front, consumer price inflation trended down with CPI inflation being at a two-year low of 3.2 per cent in January 2017. However, the wholesale price inflation recorded a sharp increase to 5.2 per cent in January 2017, up from 3.4 per cent in December 2016. It was driven by fuel prices that rose by 18.1 per cent in January 2017, up from 8.7 per cent a month ago. The core CPI inflation (headline inflation minus food and fuel) also rose to 5.1 per cent. Wholesale Price Index (WPI) inflation, on the other hand, increased to 5.2 per cent over December 2016 to January 2017 after declining slightly in the third quarter of 2016.

Meanwhile, the RBI in its sixth bi-monthly Monetary Policy announcement on  February 8, 2017, kept the repo rate (at which the RBI pumps in liquidity into the system) unchanged at 6.3 per cent and, more importantly, changed its monetary stance from ‘accommodative’ to ‘neutral’. After staying subdued in the months of November and December, 2016, the BSE Sensex showed double digit y-o-y growth in January 2017.

The fiscal scenario shows an improvement in 2016–17:Q3 compared to the previous quarters in the same fiscal year and the corresponding quarters of the previous fiscal year. While the fiscal deficit recorded positive y-o-y growth of 13.8 per cent and 32.4 per cent in Q1 and Q2 respectively, it showed a y-o-y decline of 51.4 per cent in 2016–17:Q3.

The Union Budget 2017-18: Reforms and Development Perspectives

The 5-Institute Budget Seminar 2017-18 brought together  the heads of the five institutes —CPR, ICRIER, IDF, NCAER, and NIPFP to share a reflective view of the Union Budget and its longer-term implications for the Indian economy under the leadership of the NDA Government, now well into its second half.

Expectations from the fourth budget of the Government of Prime Minister Modi are running high. The debate on the short and longer-term impact of the November demonetisation continues, with the Budget expected to present some novel measures to compensate for the costs. GST is slowly but surely moving forward, the Committee looking into the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act has completed its work, and discussion of the pluses and minuses of fiscal consolidation and the implications for monetary policy continue. Several important fiscal reforms are expected that we hope will improve the fiscal health of the economy and lay strong foundations for lifting sentiment and for sustained, rapid growth that creates rural and urban jobs. At the same time, uncertainty in global markets shows no signs of letting up, especially with Brexit and the arrival of the new US President. The executive directors of these five India’s leading economic policy research institutes came together in March 2007 for the first time to present to present their assessment of the longer term reform and development implications of the Budget.

As done for the past 10 years, these five institutions again came together at this seminar to be held at the Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi, to present their more reflective assessment of the Union Budget 2017-18.

Mr Ashok K. Bhattacharya, the Editor of the Business Standard, moderated the discussion and the Q&A with the audience.

The 5th C D Deshmukh Memorial Lecture 2017

Dr Vijay Kelkar, one of India’s most prominent economic policymakers and thinkers with over four decades of public service in and outside the government, delivered NCAER’s 5th C D Deshmukh Memorial Lecture at the Nehru Memorial Library Auditorium, Teen Murti Bhavan, in New Delhi, on January 27, 2017.

The distinguished audience included eminent economists, civil servants, industry analysts, media and a large number of students. Dr Kelkar, who was recently elected President of the prestigious Indian Statistical Institute, and is Chairman of the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy and the India Development Foundation, spoke on his Reflections on the Art and Science of Policymaking. Dr Bimal Jalan, former President of NCAER’s Governing Body and former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, was the evening’s Guest of Honour.

NCAER instituted the C D Deshmukh Memorial Lecture series in 2013 in memory of Sir Chintaman Dwarakanath Deshmukh, one of India’s most eminent economists and a founding father of NCAER in 1956.

The 2017 Memorial Lecture by Dr Kelkar came at a time of heightened economic and political debate in the country, with the Union Budget 2017-18 scheduled to be presented to Parliament in five days’ time on February 1st, impending elections to five key state assemblies, the demonetisation initiative launched in early November, and events in the US, UK, Europe and the Middle East that foretell growing economic and political uncertainty in 2017 and a challenge to the post-war, global economic order.

Against this backdrop, Kelkar drew on his intense experience and close involvement in some of India’s most significant economic reform initiatives, including as former Finance Secretary and Chairman of the 13th Finance Commission, to remind the packed audience at Teen Murti Bhavan that good economic outcomes relating to growth and efficiency come only from following a principled approach to economic policymaking.  Kelkar emphasised ten critical elements of what he called the science of policymaking, complementing this with his observations on the art of policymaking that balances economic, political and state capacity concerns.

While introducing the speaker, Dr Shekhar Shah, NCAER’s Director-General, said, “Vijay Kelkar is exactly the right person to deliver this C D Deshmukh Memorial Lecture.  There is a consistency of approach and a coherence of purpose running right through Dr Kelkar’s illustrious career.”  He added, “That, teamed up with Kelkar’s unbounded optimism about India’s prospects, his humility, grace, and generosity to his fellow colleagues, particularly those junior to him, and his willingness to roll up his sleeves and take on any number of the challenges our country faces with patience and a light, inspiring touch, make him the immense force for change that he has been for all these decades. We are privileged today to have him share with us his guidance on good policymaking at a time in India and overseas when the need for such advice has perhaps never been greater. 

At the outset, Dr Vijay Kelkar thanked NCAER for offering him the opportunity to pay homage to the memory of Dr Deshmukh, whom he described as “a titan among Indian policymakers.”  Kelkar recounted how Deshmukh had headed the selection committee that gave him his very first job in India. In focusing on the science of policymaking, Dr Kelkar argued that well-functioning markets and competition can be tremendous sources of prosperity, creativity, innovation and individual freedom, and that we should be mindful of the adverse consequences of the State interfering needlessly or coercively in the workings of the market. Noting the benefits of competition, Kelkar stated, “The market economy yields good outcomes for society when there are high levels of competition. Competition pushes firms to cut costs, to innovate, and to deliver the best bargains for customers.”  However, markets are also vulnerable to ‘market failures’—arising out of what economists call ‘externalities’, poor information, unregulated market power and socially desirable goods and services that are undersupplied—creating the critical role for good government to correct such failures.

In each case, Kelkar noted that the State and the policymaker have a major role to play. But in doing so, we should worry about the fundamental role of incentives for people and how they will be affected, about balancing the costs and benefits of policy interventions, and about the State’s capacity to implement its policies. He talked about the need for ‘sunset’ clauses on policies and laws, regular monitoring of their effectiveness, and avoiding the temptation of trying to attain multiple goals with too few policy instruments. Turning to the art of policymaking, Kelkar emphasised the part played by politics, intuition, philosophy, and experience in real-world policymaking, over and beyond sharp economic analysis. He noted the vital need to sequence the building of State capacity by first establishing easy objectives before attempting to tackle complex ones. As an example, Kelkar noted that “it is better to first build a single-rate GST with a low GST rate, achieve full mastery of this, and only then consider more complex possibilities such as high rates and multiple rates”. According to him, some of the constraints that impede rational analysis in the country include the unavailability of comprehensive data, flaws in the standard public data sources, and limited access to statistics and analytical models for undertaking the formal economic assessment of many problems.

While delineating ways of improving policymaking in India, Dr Kelkar stressed the need for continuous research on the Indian economy.  He said that India needs to encourage independent policy think tanks, universities and research organisations that conduct policy research and foster public debate. In this context, Kelkar said, “We should …recognise the scarcity and value of criticism, and create an environment where we disagree without being disagreeable. There should be pleasant friendships, and an environment in which many persons are comfortable airing divergent views. Critics of public policy strategies are a valuable part of society, and essential for the process of crossing the river by feeling the stones.

He referred to Shri Lovraj Kumar, a distinguished past President of NCAER, former civil servant and also Dr Kelkar’s mentor, who had held that in open societies more knowledge leads to better policies.  Kelkar noted that NCAER, founded by Dr C. D. Deshmukh along with others, was an outstanding reason for his optimism in this regard. Dr Kelkar concluded the 2017 Lecture with the argument that policies formulated in a transparent manner and implemented on an ‘MFN’ basis—favouring no one party over others—have a much greater chance of acceptance and achieving outcomes. Citing the example of the Finance Commission’s awards for revenue sharing, he said that these have been accepted by all stakeholders because the policy recommendations were arrived at on a fair and transparent basis.

In thanking him, Dr Shekhar Shah said, “What Vijay Kelkar has done today is to provide us a road map and a torch for troubled times.”  He added, “Kelkar’s lecture should be must reading (and viewing) for all policymakers keen to make the most of the immense opportunities India offers for its future if we know how to use them wisely.”

Vijay Kelkar is one of India’s most influential policy economists, with over four decades of public service in and outside government. He is currently the Chairman of NIPFP and the India Development Foundation, and was recently elected President of the Indian Statistical Institute. He has been involved in some of India’s most significant economic reform initiatives, including on direct and indirect taxes, on fiscal responsibility and its underlying law, as Chairman of the 13th Finance Commission, on enhancing domestic oil and gas production, as Chairman of the Committee on PPPs in Infrastructure, and his strong and steady promotion of India’s long-awaited GST. Kelkar has been India’s Finance Secretary, the Executive Director for India, Bangladesh, Bhutan and Sri Lanka on the IMF Board; Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas; Director and Coordinator of the International Trade Division at UNCTAD in Geneva; Chairman, Bureau of Industrial Costs and Prices; and Secretary, Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister. Kelkar recently joined with Ratan Tata and Nandan Nilekani to start Avanti, a technology enabled platform for financial inclusion.  Kelkar was awarded the Padma Vibhushan by the President of India in 2011. Kelkar holds a BE from the College of Engineering, Pune, an MS in Economics from the University of Minnesota, and a PhD in Economics from the University of California, Berkeley.

The 2017 C D Deshmukh Lecture is part of NCAER’s celebration of its 60th year

 

Previous Lectures:

IPF 2016 Lecture

India and the Global Economy Post-Brexit  by Dr Arvind Subramanian

Dr Arvind Subramanian, Chief Economic Advisor, Government of India delivered NCAER’s 2016 India Policy Forum Lecture  on July 12, 2016 to an audience of distinguished economists, civil servants, industry analysts, media, and students at the India International Centre in New Delhi.  Dr Subramanian spoke on India and the World Economy in the wake of Brexit. He also released NCAER’s 2015-16 India Policy Forum volume on this occasion. The Union Finance Minister Shri Arun Jaitley also joined the lecture as part of the distinguished audience.

The 2016 IPF Lecture was part of the annual India Policy Forum economic policy research conference organised by NCAER with the objective of promoting rigorous research on Indian economic policy. The IPF comprises presentations of original commissioned papers, the annual conference leading to a published volume, and the annual IPF Lecture. A distinguished international Advisory Panel and an international Research Panel guide the IPF.  The annual IPF Volume is the highest ranked economic journal out of India based on citation counts. The IPF enters its 13th year in 2016.

In introducing the speaker, Dr Shekhar Shah, NCAER’s Director-General, said, “This is the India Policy Forum’s 13th year as we also celebrate NCAER’s 60th Anniversary in 2016.  We are especially privileged for the 2016 IPF Lecture to have with us Dr Arvind Subramanian, who in his position as the Chief Economic Advisor to the Government of India has perhaps spoken in one of the clearest voices in recent times on economic policy, both looking backwards with realism and analytical rigour and looking ahead with superb insights into the changing shape of global trade and finance.”

Dr Arvind Subramanian started his talk by complimenting NCAER and the IPF, and noted that, “It is fair to say that the IPF remains one of the really big events in the summer season of New Delhi… It has produced over the course of the last 12-13 years a lot of good research on policy in India of which I have been an avid consumer.”

 

In his IPF Lecture Dr Subramanian spoke about the implications for globalization of     Brexit and other recent developments, and what they might mean for India’s          prospects for sustained, rapid  development and convergence with the advanced    countries.  He distinguished between periods of “post-War re-globalization” from about 1960 to 1990 and then a period of “hyper-globalization” from 1990 to about 2012, with the latter coinciding with what he called the phenomena of a “Weakening West” and the “Rising Rest”, with the latter obviously including India.  He said that it was ironic that there was an inversion in the concerns on globalization: in the earlier period the anxieties were in the South around issues such  the “Washington Consensus”, and now the anxieties were in the North with the rising disenchantment against globalisation in both the US and Europe.

Looking at the developments over the past decade now culminating in Brexit and the rising tide of anger over globalization in the US, he noted that “hyper-globalization is dead, but long live globalization.”  Clearly the world had moved. It is more than likely that “deep globalization”, such as immigration and labor mobility, even amongst equals, would be difficult to sustain.  But it is very likely that “shallow globalization”, such as in ideas, technology, and even foreign capital, may be sustainable.

If there were to be limits on globalization, Dr Subramanian asked what the implications for India might be.  Should India turn to domestic consumption-led (the “Make for India” approach) led growth? If not, will the current external environment allow an export promotion/globalization strategy?  As Dr Subramanian put it, “Can the world absorb another China?” And finally, what should India do to pursue outward looking growth?

In the rest of his fascinating speech that held a standing-room only audience of more than 150 people at the India International Centre in rapt attention, Dr Subramanian shared his thinking on these three vital questions. He noted that domestic consumption-led growth of 8 percent was historically unprecedented and theoretically doubtful. So India should not just pursue a domestic-oriented growth strategy.  If China’s rebalancing were to be successful and assuming that the world’s carrying capacity for services was larger than for manufacturing, then Subramanian felt that India could achieve 15 percent real export growth and sustained 8 percent GDP growth, not uniquely without an outward strategy, but perhaps differently from other countries with a combination of services and manufacturing dynamism that India can uniquely achieve.

Dr Subramanian concluded by noting that India and other developing countries have a strong incentive to keep global markets open and preventing a reversal of globalization, and that India’s rapid growth depends on it. This would require India to assume even more of a leadership position on globalization and perhaps even a revitalizing WTO and multilateralism. Quoting Keynes, Subramanian observed that India must ensure that the “projects and politics of nativism and isolationism do not play serpent to the paradise of open markets and borders.”

Dr Arvind Subramanian is the Chief Economic Advisor to the Government of India. He has been the Dennis Weatherstone Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington DC, and has taught at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and at Johns Hopkins’ School for Advanced International Studies. Subramanian has also been a Senior Fellow at the Center for Global Development and Assistant Director in the Research Department of the International Monetary Fund, and has served at the GATT in Geneva during the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations. His books include: India’s Turn: Understanding the Economic Transformation (2008), Eclipse: Living in the Shadow of China’s Economic Dominance (2011), and Who Needs to Open the Capital Account? (2012). He has also published widely in leading magazines and newspapers, including The Economist, Washington PostNew York TimesWall Street Journal, and Financial Times. He continues to contribute to one of India’s leading financial dailies, the Business Standard. Subramanian received his BA in Economics from St. Stephens College at Delhi University, an MBA from IIM Ahmedabad and an MPhil and DPhil from Oxford.

 The 2016 India Policy Forum Lecture is part of NCAER’s celebration of its 60th Anniversary

    Get updates from NCAER