Capital flow measures: structural or cyclical policy tools?

Capital flow measures: structural or cyclical policy tools?

Poonam Gupta, Barry Eichengreen and Oliver Masetti
World Bank 21 April, 2018

Published in: The World Bank

This paper analyzes the use of capital flow measures in emerging markets. Drawing on a specially compiled new database of capital flow measures, it establishes that policy makers in emerging market economies do not use capital flow measures as an active tool at business cycle frequency. While there is a general trend toward the liberalization of capital accounts, the use of capital flow measures as a countercyclical policy tool is rather sporadic. Instead, countries show a distinct preference for using monetary policy, exchange rate adjustments, macro prudential measures, and adjustments in external reserves to modulate the impacts of domestic business cycles, international liquidity cycles, and shocks to capital flows. Regulation of different kinds of capital flows — resident and nonresident flows; inflows and outflows; and foreign direct investment, portfolio, and banking sector flows — is changed infrequently and is acyclical to domestic business and external liquidity cycles.

Latest Publications

External Pub
05 March 2026

Changes in the household expenditure basket in India during COVID-19

Pallavi Choudhuri & Sonalde Desai
External Pub
28 February 2026

The Trinity of Support: Negotiating Space and Care for Older Adults in a Transitioning Society

Debasis Barik, Neerad Deshmukh & others
External Pub
17 February 2026

What Did They Say? Respondent Identity, Question Framing and the Measurement of Employment 

Nishat Anjum, Rosa Abraham & others

    Get updates from NCAER