What is Women’s Work? Challenges of Measurement for Policy Design

The NCAER Gender Hub and FESDIG (Feminist Economics Saturday Discussion Group) jointly organised a hybrid discussion on “What is Women’s Work? Challenges of Measurement for Policy Design” on 12 June 2023, at NCAER.

Despite the strong policy interest in women’s low and declining work participation in India, data and research on this subject continues to show contrasting and puzzling results. This discussion explored these puzzles and examined how far the definition of women’s work and its measurement are consistent with policy needs.

The discussion was held in two parts. During the first hour, participants from different backgrounds briefly offered their perspectives on definitions and measurement of women’s work, including work in the digital economy, the informal sector, and data biases in collection. The second hour was devoted to an open discussion on the topic.

The discussion was hosted by Sonalde Desai, Professor, NCAER; Pallavi Choudhuri, Senior Fellow, NCAER; and Bina Agarwal, Founder, FESDIG.

The other eminent participants, who joined the discussion both online and in person, included Renana Jhabvala, SEWA Bharat; Poonam Muttreja, Population Foundation of India; Nayantara Sarma, World Bank; Deepita Chakravarty, Ambedkar University, Delhi; Shiva Kumar, Harvard Kennedy School;  Paromita Sen, SEWA Bharat; Bornali Bhandari, NCAER; Amit Basole, Azim Premji University; Aiman Haque, SEWA Bharat; Saba Ahmed, SEWA Bharat; Nandini Dey, SEWA Bharat; Rosa Abraham, Azim Premji University; Ellina Samantroy, V.V. Giri National Labour Institute; Aasha Kapur Mehta, Institute for Human Development; Jeemol Unni, Ahmedabad University; Amaresh Dubey, NCAER and Jawaharlal Nehru University; Kieran Walsh, ILO; Ratna Sudarshan, former Institute of Social Studies Trust; and Sona Mitra, IWWAGE, Krea University.

Presentation on “User Beware: The Promises and Pitfalls of Using Tax Data to Study U.S. Internal Migration”

NCAER organised an internal seminar titled, ‘User Beware: The promises and pitfalls of using tax data to study U.S. internal migration’ by Jack DeWaard, Scientific Director of Social and Behavioral Science Research, at The Population Council, New York, on Tuesday, 16 May 2023.

Jack DeWaard is Scientific Director of Social and Behavioral Science Research at the Population Council. Prior to joining the Population Council, he was an Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology and Graduate Faculty of Population Studies in the Minnesota Population Center at the University of Minnesota. His research interests focus on migration systems and networks, climate and environmental migration and displacement, and inequality and incorporation.

In the Seminar, Dr DeWaard pointed out that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) makes publicly and freely available period migration data at the state and county levels. Among their uses, these data inform estimates of net-migration as part of the U.S. Census Bureau’s Population Estimates Program, which, in turn, are used for producing other annual statistics, survey design, business and community planning, and federal funding allocations. In his talk, he detailed a highly concerning, apparently systemic, and presently unresolved problem with the IRS migration data since the IRS took over responsibilities for preparing these data from the U.S. Census Bureau in 2011. Unless and until this problem is addressed by the IRS, he concluded that the post-2011 data should not be used.

Presentation on “Thematic Bonds: A Tool to Finance India’s Energy Transition”

NCAER hosted a seminar on “Thematic Bonds: A Tool to Finance India’s Energy Transition” by Dr. Gautam Jain, Senior Research Scholar at the Centre on Global Energy Policy, School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, on Monday, 15 May 2023. Dr. Jain’s presentation covered the findings and conclusions of his recent research concerning Thematic Bonds: Financing Net-Zero Transition in Emerging Market and Developing Economies and India Integrates Green Bonds Into Its Decarbonization Strategy.

Dr. Jain has previously been a portfolio manager and strategist in the financial industry, where he covered emerging markets. He has worked at asset management firms and investment banks, including The Rohatyn Group, Barclays Capital, and Millennium Partners. He has helped manage emerging market local debt and hard-currency bond portfolios, encompassing currencies, interest rate instruments, and sovereign credits. Dr. Jain holds a PhD in Operations Research from Columbia University, an M.S. in Industrial Engineering from Iowa State University, and a BTech in Mechanical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. He is a CFA charter holder and a Cornell EMI Fellow.

The discussion was chaired by Dr. Sudipto Mundle, Chairman, Centre for Development Studies, and Non Resident Senior Fellow, NCAER. The discussants for the event were Mr. Gagan Sidhu, Director- CEEW Centre for Energy Finance; Ms. Neha Kumar, Head, South Asia Programme, Climate Bonds Initiative; and Dr. Praveen Kumar, Senior Adviser, NCAER.

Presentation of IMF’s Fiscal Monitor, April 2023

NCAER organised an event in collaboration with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the presentation of an Analytical Chapter titled, “Inflation and Disinflation: What Role for Fiscal Policy”, from the latest IMF Fiscal Monitor released in April 2023. Dr Marcos Poplawski-Ribeiro, Deputy Division Chief in the IMF’s Fiscal Policy and Surveillance Division of the Fiscal Affairs Department, made the presentation. He has previously held positions in the IMF’s Research, Fiscal Affairs, and African Departments, including as the IMF’s Resident Representative in Gabon during 2017–21.

The upsurge in inflation that began in 2021—the sharpest in more than three decades—has affected fiscal accounts, worsened poverty, and altered the distribution of households’ well-being, calling on policymakers to respond. The Analytical Chapter analyses these developments and explores how fiscal policy can do its part to curb inflation while supporting the vulnerable. The chapter finds that though surprise inflation may offer some breathing room for debt ratios, attempts to keep surprising bondholders have historically proven futile or harmful. Indexation practices vary considerably across countries. Hence, when reviewing them, policymakers need to balance protecting specific groups and avoiding making inflation more persistent. Redistribution effects of inflation, in turn, depend on three channels: consumption patterns, income, and wealth. The chapter also estimates the effect of fiscal policy on inflation, and shows that targeted fiscal policy can support monetary policy in lowering inflation while protecting those most affected by the cost-of-living crisis.

The discussion was chaired by Dr Ratna Sahay, Professor at NCAER. The discussants for the event were Dr Ashok Gulati, Chair Professor for Agriculture at Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, and Dr Poonam Gupta, Director General at NCAER and Member of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister.

Commenting on the presentation by Dr Ribeiro, Dr Poonam Gupta remarked, “The Analytical Chapter of the IMF’s Fiscal Monitor makes it clear that fiscal deficit and public debt, which increased significantly around the world during COVID, have remained elevated over the last two years. Monetary policy alone may not suffice to normalise inflation, and needs to be combined with fiscal consolidation, along with targeted support to the most vulnerable populations.” She also suggested that inflation is declining but will remain above the pre-pandemic level by 2024. “Public debt is an issue of concern in Advanced Economies but Low-Income Countries need debt relief. As for India, it has managed to keep inflation anchored and range-bound within an orbit of 2-6 per cent, and eventually it could settle at around 4 per cent, which is quite manageable”, she concluded.

Highlighting the criticality of controlling inflation, especially in the context of the ramifications of the pandemic for various economies, Dr Gulati averred, “The focus on inflation and measures to curb it in various countries in the Fiscal Monitor are very well-timed and the need of the hour, as in many nations, especially in Africa, Latin America, and South Asia, inflation is not just a number but literally a life-and-death issue. It is thus imperative to devise an amalgamated package comprising components of both fiscal and monetary policy to tame inflation… Trade policy is equally important in controlling inflation in the emerging markets.”

The 17th 5-Institute Budget Seminar 2023

The National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) hosted the 17th 5-Institute Budget Seminar on Monday, February 6, 2023.

As part of a tradition that has been continuing since 2007, the seminar brought together the heads of five Institutes, at the NCAER campus, that is, NCAER, the Centre for Policy Research (CPR), the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), the India Development Foundation (IDF), and the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP), to discuss and present a reform and development perspective on the 2023-24 Union Budget. The speakers at this 17th edition of the Budget seminar included Poonam Gupta from NCAER, Deepak Mishra from ICRIER, Nishant Chadha from IDF, R. Kavita Rao from NIPFP, and Yamini Aiyar from CPR.

The discussion was chaired by V. Anantha Nageswaran, Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India.

During her presentation, the Director General of NCAER, Poonam Gupta pointed out, “The 2023-24 Union Budget focused on domestic consumption as the main engine of growth, followed by public investment as the second, albeit smaller, growth engine. Significantly, it has not equally supported private investment or exports as accelerators of economic growth or generators of employment. But then, key policy announcements need not be confined to the annual budgetary exercise. Let’s hope that equally zealous announcements would follow through the year to support exports and private investments, both domestic and foreign direct investments. This would be crucial for ensuring that the Indian economy accelerates on all four engines, and not just on two.”

Flagging the issue of fiscal consolidation, R. Kavita Rao, Director, NIPFP, said, “Fiscal consolidation, as highlighted in the Budget, signifies an apt reflection of fiscal marksmanship.” She also said that the increase in capital expenditure announced in the Budget was a positive move but it remains to be seen if increase in capex really leads to an increase in employment, especially as most infrastructural development in recent years is being done through machines rather than human labour. She further opined, “Since the Government hopes to increase capex without increasing revenue expenditure, some re-allocation can be expected in capex. …There should also be room for freezing of revenue expenditure, if required.”

According to Deepak Mishra, Director and Chief Executive, ICRIER, “The 2023-24 Budget is likely to be best remembered for giving everyone something to feel good about, without resorting to reckless and populist policies. The Finance Minister did a great balancing act with respect to the development trinity: growth, distribution (inclusion), and stability. But the Budget did not announce any bold structural reform to tackle some of the binding constraints facing the economy, especially those that can help India to overcome its export stagnation.”

Focusing on the implications of Budget 2022-23 for the health and education sectors, and touching upon the themes of social security and jobs, Nishant Chadha, Fellow and Head, Projects, IDF, stated, “Productivity is multiplicative, and we need to create more productive jobs and to retain skilled people to build our economy. Overall, this Budget also makes it clear that education in the country needs a fix.”

Yamini Aiyar, President, CPR, highlighted the underlying political economy behind the Budget, reflected in limited State capacity for implementing the various schemes launched by the Government. She argued, “Since there is a limit to capital expenditure, we need better management, better incentivisation of the States, and a better federal structure to deal with the federal vacuum that inevitably arises when the Union Government prioritises schemes. She also suggested, “Since India’s fiscal structure is quite decentralised and de-concentrated, States often wait for implementation of Centrally-sponsored schemes before executing them at the State level. The ultimate trade-off is that we do not invest in human capital—an area that needs to be addressed urgently.”

Speaking on the occasion, the Chief Economic Adviser, Government of India, Dr V. Anantha Nageswaran noted, “The bulk of external market and other reforms have been undertaken in the last 20-30 years, and thereafter, we have been implementing incremental reforms, which is a focal point in the 2023-24 Budget.”

Dr Nageswaran also lauded the current Budget for “ensuring that the system has been cleaned up and the databases updated successfully, as a result of which no beneficiary will be left out. In fact, the allocations for various Centrally-sponsored projects may have gone down in the last few years but money going into the hands of the beneficiaries has doubled because the systems have been streamlined, leakages have been plugged, outputs are improving, and the process of identifying beneficiaries has been successfully and efficiently implemented.”

Dr Nageswaran also expressed his appreciation for the manner in which India had handled and implemented the vaccination programme post the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. “Unlike many other countries, including the advanced economies, India implemented its vaccination programme with tremendous efficiency, successfully vaccinating over 1 billion people, and even managing to export vaccines to countries that could not access them otherwise.”

Finally, Dr Nageswaran touched upon the issue of the debt-to-GDP ratio, and averred that India was only one of three countries worldwide (Indonesia and Germany being the other two) where the debt-to-GDP ratio had been kept under check during the pandemic years, going up by only 3 per cent, from 81 per cent to 84 per cent—a significant achievement, not witnessed even in many advanced economies.

    Get updates from NCAER